On Monday 14 December 2009 04:27:52 am Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > Le Lun 14 décembre 2009 12:45, Josephine Tannhäuser a écrit : > > of course this is a practicable rule, BUT > > the problem is upstream or the rule itself. > > > > kernels internal zlib is not a lib its a module, > > wordpress internal php-gettext is not a lib, its a php code file. > > > > The trick is to declare that a lib is not a lib and you can close the > > bug as not a bug... > > Easy cake.. > > This is playing with words. I'm sure that when the guideline was written > lib was intended as "some code in any language that can be shared". What > is less clear is the other shared components which are not code (resource > files, fonts, templates, etc) but there is no doubt at all in my mind on > the code part. > > Though your interpretation is one reason we keep refining guidelines to > leave no room for bad packager excuses. I just wanted to jump in and point out that this isn't just Nicolas picking on you, he's right. -- Conrad Meyer <cemeyer@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
