On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 17:14 -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > On 12/11/2009 02:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 08:57 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote: > >> File a bug please, attaching your xorg.conf, Xorg.0.log and output of > >> the dmesg command (all from inside of VB virtual machine, of course). > > > > ...aaaand (oh boy, I love it when a plan comes together) mark it as > > blocking F13Beta , because I reckon this breaks beta criterion #4: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria > > I like the sentiment here, but I'm not sure this is really in the > spirit of the criteria - Vasily, as I understand it, is still in the > process of implementing the support for UEFI on VirtualBox. There's at least two issues here. One is that we're not shipping the native X driver for vbox video yet. Last I checked this was because it's hidden away in the vbox source, and didn't build against whatever X server we were shipping, and that vbox upstream didn't _want_ it shipped externally yet because they hadn't finalized the interface. The other is that the kernel doesn't seem to be binding an efifb device to it, and/or that it is and X is not noticing that and thus loads vesa instead of fbdev. - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
