Re: x86-64 on i386 (was Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Mon, Dec 14, 2009 at 00:32:15 +0000,
  John5342 <john5342@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> Actually i think the reason AMDs approach worked was because it was
> backward compatible with ix86 so instead of having to have an OS ready
> up front and people having to migrate wholesale customers could start
> upgrading to x86_64 processors slowly while still using 32bit OS. Then
> as 64bit OS becomes available people can use that whilst still
> enjoying their favorite apps that haven't yet been ported to 64bit. In
> short it was evolutionary rather than revolutionary.

I think that was also needed. But I don't think they would have been able to
get traction in the server market without having the prompt linux / gcc
support.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux