On Fri, 2009-12-11 at 17:14 -0500, Peter Jones wrote: > On 12/11/2009 02:41 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Thu, 2009-12-10 at 08:57 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote: > >> Dne 10.12.2009 07:36, Vasily Levchenko napsal(a): > >>>> Does it not work without an xorg.conf, that would be the first goal. > >>>> > >>> > >>> No. > >> > >> File a bug please, attaching your xorg.conf, Xorg.0.log and output of > >> the dmesg command (all from inside of VB virtual machine, of course). > > > > ...aaaand (oh boy, I love it when a plan comes together) mark it as > > blocking F13Beta , because I reckon this breaks beta criterion #4: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria > > I like the sentiment here, but I'm not sure this is really in the > spirit of the criteria - Vasily, as I understand it, is still in the > process of implementing the support for UEFI on VirtualBox. > > Which is to say, yes, we need to fix the parts that are distro problems, > but I'm not sure we've gotten to the point where VirtualBox+UEFI is > expected to be a working system in the first place. > > But maybe I'm wrong - Vasily, what do you think? >From what I saw in the thread, the bug seems to be that X is assuming the presence of a VGA BIOS, which would seem to be a fairly generic problem that would hit any EFI setup. AIUI anyway. See Vasily's message of a couple of days ago. But I could be wrong, and also I'm not sure why he's testing with F11 rather than F12 or Rawhide. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
