On Mon, 2009-12-07 at 14:55 -0800, Adam Williamson wrote: > During FUDCon, we've been working on revising the Fedora release criteria. > John Poelstra had already fleshed out a structure and much of the final > content, and we've been revising and tweaking it in conjunction with QA > (myself, Will Woods and James Laska), release engineering (Jesse Keating), > anaconda team (especially Denise Dumas and Peter Jones) and desktop team > (Christopher Aillon and Matthias Clasen, who provided suggestions at an > earlier stage). > > The new structure is based around a general page and specific pages for the > Fedora 13 Alpha, Beta and Final releases (which have been written > generically so they can easily be converted into pages for F14 and all > future releases just by copying and pasting). You can find the criteria > here: > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Release_Criteria > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Alpha_Release_Criteria > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Beta_Release_Criteria > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_13_Final_Release_Criteria > > they should contain everything you need to know. We based most of the > criteria around testing that was already being carried out but with no > formal policy basis, with additional suggestions from the anaconda and > desktop teams. > > We will follow these criteria for the Fedora 13 release process. So if you > can see any problems or potential trouble with any of this, please do reply > and let us know! > > Desktop team - can you please let us know of any additional things that you > would expect to be working at each point during the release cycle? Note > that only things that *must* be working at each point should be listed on > these pages, not nice-to-haves. You must be able to commit to the idea > that, if any criterion on the page is not met, we would slip the release in > question. Not sure if this has been raised yet, but are we specifying when in the release that packages should be signed with a valid signature? I believe packages are signed at all release milestones, but I'd like to clear up that assumption. Thanks, James
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
