On Tue, Dec 08, 2009 at 10:44:14AM -0500, Doug Ledford wrote: > > There has been no public response to this, and Jussi has indicated in > the referenced bugzilla that at least one former lam board member is > advocating for the package's removal. The current plan is to block lam > from rawhide. If someone decides later that they wish to take over > ownership of lam, then we can always unblock it. However, this does > mean that the few lam using packages out there will need to be rebuilt > to remove their lam subpackages and dependency. I doubt lam users are on this list: lam users are certainly users who favor stability over change, and are likely not to be that much interested in fedora, and even less in fedora development. If I still used fedora, I would have liked to have lam kept in fedora, but I don't use fedora anymore. In the end it really depend how much you want to keep/attract users interested in stability versus the cost of maintaining software for those users given that fedora is unlikely to be in their distributions of choice. -- Pat -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
