On Thu, 2009-12-03 at 00:32 -0500, Seth Vidal wrote: > We wouldn't be talking about removing the original GA set - just adding > updated pkgs into the path. So you'd still have the number of pkgs -just > all in one repo, that you have to download all of the metadata for all of > the more often, despite that 15K of them don't CHANGE. I don't think that was actually made clear in the initial proposal. I'd been assuming that the proposal was _exactly_ to remove the GA set. Usually, when a newer package shows up in any given repository, we don't keep the previous version of the package, do we? So I assumed the proposal was expecting that behaviour for the combined repository. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
