Re: Proposed F13 feature: drop separate updates repository

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, 2009-12-02 at 17:58 +0000, Matthew Booth wrote:
> The GA package could be kept around as a separate, static repo nobody 
> uses under normal circumstances. Combining GA+updates into a single repo 
> would not consume additional bandwidth for anybody at all, and only 
> testers would have to do any additional configuration. 

After initial install, a GA+updates repo would cause consumption of more
bandwidth, as the repodata would change on a nearly daily basis causing
rather large repodata files to be downloaded over and over and over
again.  Instead what we have now is a static GA repo that is downloaded
usually once, and a much much much smaller updates repo that is
downloaded more frequently, but since it is much smaller the impact is
much lower.

-- 
Jesse Keating
Fedora -- Freedom² is a feature!
identi.ca: http://identi.ca/jkeating

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux