On Sat, 28 Nov 2009 00:32:04 +0100 drago01 <drago01@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Fri, Nov 27, 2009 at 11:29 PM, Felix Miata <mrmazda@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> > wrote: > > On 2009/11/28 03:01 (GMT+0530) Rahul Sundaram composed: > > > >> Huh? Your perspective just seems very odd. In a year, if we don't > >> have a composited desktop by default in Fedora, I would be very > >> very surprised. Just watch. > > > > Good thing all puters don't depend on batteries for power. > > It does not matter how often people repeat that (and even if KDE has > an option to "disable composting to save power") just running a > composite manager should NOT require any more power. > If it does it is just broken. In fact it should use LESS power if done > right (less wakeups because you don't have to update the whole screen > every time something changes), > > Let me say this again a cm DOES NOT require more power than a non > composited desktop. (notice the NOT) sadly I am no longer convinced you are correct. But to each their own..... in the long run we'll end up with whatever solution is best, whichever it is. -- Arjan van de Ven Intel Open Source Technology Centre For development, discussion and tips for power savings, visit http://www.lesswatts.org -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
