On 11/28/2009 02:32 AM, Debayan Banerjee wrote: > 2009/11/28 Rahul Sundaram > >> Why? It's just shows your personal preference for a editor. Emacs is >> certainly not needed for software development. > > Well one does need an editor for development. Assuming vim and emacs > have roughly equal user bases, chosing emacs over vim for the > distribution shows Fedora packagers' personal preference too. I guess > both vim and emacs should be available. First of all, I don't think we have enough data to determine which editor is being used by developers. How did you come up with the roughly 50/50 estimate? I am sure we need a editor for development but I might be using Eclipse or even Anjuta? IMO, it can be listed as a optional package in the group and not more than that. Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
