On Thu, 2009-11-26 at 11:32 +0100, Karel Klic wrote: > On 11/25/2009 06:54 PM, Adam Williamson wrote: > > What do you think of the idea of running the improved duplicate > > detection logic over existing abrt bug reports in Bugzilla? Would that > > be feasible, perhaps with some help from the Bugzilla maintainer? > > Thanks! > > > > Many backtraces currently stored in bugzilla are damaged (truncated) by > a bug (in Linux kernel?). That bug has been fixed, but the backtraces > already uploaded with that bug are not parsable by current backtrace parser. > > I haven't figured out how to tweak the parser to handle the damaged > backtraces yet. However, I'd like to focus on the new duplication > detection mechanism for now, because it is more important from my point > of view. Sure, I agree that would take priority for now. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
