On Nov 24, 2009, at 22:49, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/25/2009 01:32 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
On Nov 24, 2009, at 19:30, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11/24/2009 09:58 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
On Tue, Nov 24, 2009 at 09:19:22PM -0500, Jeff Garzik wrote:
So would this mean one disk with two "repositories" on it, or is
everything
mashed together all in one repository?
The current x86-64 has both 32-bit and 64-bit "mashed together,"
so
that
sort of configuration would be more of the same.
Well, it's currently only half-mashed.
In Fedora 12, the i686 and x86-64 rpms are in the same directory, on
the x86-64 DVD ISO.
That's sufficiently mashed for my purposes, but whatever... :)
Look closer. It is only a small subset of the i686 content in the
x86_64
repo for multilib purposes.
That's merely a space issue, not any failure to or absence of "mash"
Jeff
Wow. Ok let me be clear here. The 32 bit packages you see are
specifically selected to fulfill a multilib role. We cannot put every
package in as there would be lots of conflicts in the packages that
are nit suitable for multilib.
Please stop making assumptions about our compose process and strategy
which you clearly don't understand.
--
Jes
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
