On Mon, 2009-11-23 at 10:52 -0500, Adam Jackson wrote: > On Sun, 2009-11-22 at 19:21 +0100, Martin Sourada wrote: > > So, > > > > since I've already received 3 separate bug reports caused by BadIDChoice > > X Error in subtitleeditor [1][2][3] (haven't had enough time to debug > > and try to fix it yet though) by abrt, I wonder if there is any room for > > duplicity detection improvement in these cases, or if we are doomed to > > zillions of duplicates in rhbz? (btw. otherwise abrt is awesome, IMHO > > the bugreports from abrt are much more useful than before :-) > > I know this is non-obvious, but: BadIDChoice or BadImplementation X > errors are _always_ bugs in libX11 or the server itself, respectively. > Please reassign BadIDChoice bugs to libX11. > Thanks for the info. Bug 538382 reassigned to libX11. Martin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
