Re: x86-64 on i386 (was Re: Promoting i386 version over x86_64?)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> said:
> Running a 64-bit kernel with a 32-bit userland is a common practice on 
> non-x86 platforms, and non-Linux OS's.  For a lot of tasks, you simply 
> do not need 64-bit pointers and a 64-bit process address space.  Both 
> executable code and in-memory data structures tend to be smaller on 32-bit.

However, on x86, the 32->64 bit jump also gives a larger register set
and (IIRC) SSE (or SSE2?) on all chips, which allows better code
generation for all kinds of things.

The i386 architecture is register-starved compared to many other
architectures.
-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux