On Wed, 2009-11-18 at 22:03 +0100, Matěj Cepl wrote: > Dne 18.11.2009 21:07, Jeff Spaleta napsal(a): > > On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 11:03 AM, Jerry James <loganjerry@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> Should the NEEDINFO flag be cleared by adding such a comment? I > >> didn't expect that. > > > > when you set the needinfo flag did you set it such that anyone could > > clear it or did you specifically require that the original reporter > > needed to reply in the bugzilla interface? > > But to be fait. Bugzappers should be conscious of this and careful not > to liquidate needinfo by mistake, even when it was set incorrectly. To be clear (we went over this on IRC :>) the initial message talking about 'Bug Zapper' is talking about the automated F10 EOL bug housekeeping. Since that added a comment on each bug, if those bugs were in 'needinfo anyone' state, they're now not in it any more. =) there's not much we can do about that. but indeed, everyone should be careful to use needinfo appropriately. generally it's a bad idea to use the 'needinfo from anyone' flag as it will be cleared incorrectly far too often. -- Adam Williamson Fedora QA Community Monkey IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org http://www.happyassassin.net -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
