On 11/18/2009 11:27 PM, nodata wrote: > Why is it a problem? For all of the reasons that it has never been a > problem before. For the reason that the user is not the administrator or > the box, for the reason that the user is the user for a reason, for the > reason that by default Linux should act like Linux, for the reason that > the default is bad, All of these seems rather circular. for the reason that this is undocumented, I have asked for more documentation already which I consider a valid point. for the > reason that it assumes automatic updates are enabled, I am not sure why you say that? Automatic updates are not enabled by default. for the reason > that the user is not the one with knowledge of the box and what > resources are available on it, for the reason that it may be against > corporate policy, for the reason of change management... Should the defaults be targeted towards home users or corporate desktop considering the short lifecycle of Fedora and the target audience? I am not sure there are corporate deployments but wouldn't they be heavily customized their desktop deployments and kickstarting it anyway? Rahul -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
