On Tue, 2009-11-17 at 08:10 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote: > On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 2:48 AM, Jeff Garzik <jgarzik@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > As the URL notes under "Detailed Description," that is not handled at all. > > It wraps all file I/O, yum or not, into the snapshot. > > Yeah but you can't roll back userland transactions. Not to mention > you are talking about an interface that may change quite a bit over > the next year. That seems like a significant limitation, I'm also not sure that the current transaction API would be usable by rpm. Anyway... > We have snapshotting abilities now, and yes it's a big > hammer, but just because its a bit of a blunt instrument doesn't mean > we shouldn't take advantage of it. This implies that "all you have is a hammer" but you can already run "yum history undo". -- James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "I'd just like to see a realistic approach to updates via packages." -- Les Mikesell -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
