On Mon, 16 Nov 2009 13:24:03 -0700, Nathanael wrote:
> >> libdspam.x86_64: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package /usr/lib64/libdspam.so
> [gnat@iridium ~]$ ls -l /usr/lib64/libdspam.*
> -rw-r--r--. 1 root root 175812 2009-11-15 13:54 /usr/lib64/libdspam.a
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 954 2009-11-15 13:54 /usr/lib64/libdspam.la
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-15 13:59 /usr/lib64/libdspam.so
> -> libdspam.so.7.0.0
> lrwxrwxrwx. 1 root root 17 2009-11-15 13:59 /usr/lib64/libdspam.so.7
> -> libdspam.so.7.0.0
> -rwxr-xr-x. 1 root root 111000 2009-11-15 13:54 /usr/lib64/libdspam.so.7.0.0
>
>
> [gnat@iridium ~]$ ldd /usr/bin/dspam_2sql
> linux-vdso.so.1 => (0x00007fffccfda000)
> ==> libdspam.so.7 => /usr/lib64/libdspam.so.7 (0x00007f7f4d89e000)
That means you only need the .so.7 and the .so.7.0.0 libs in %{_libdir}.
For the .a lib, follow the Fedora Packaging Guidelines on Static Libraries.
Same for the .la libtool archive. Delete it.
The symlink libdspam.so is not needed at run-time. It's only needed to
make the -ldspam linking step work when building software with this lib.
--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
