Re: Broken deps for rawhide the past few days

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Once upon a time, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxx> said:
> Many of you received emails over the weekend and this morning regarding
> broken deps in rawhide.  If these emails mentioned that the deps were
> broken on ppc or ppc64 they can be ignored.  We are no longer producing
> ppc/ppc64 as a primary arch, however we forgot to tag the config change
> that enacted this on our compose tools.  We were attempting to compose
> ppc(64) trees with only noarch packages, and well things didn't work so
> hot.

As a mirror admin: what does this mean for .../development/ppc{,64}?
Will they go away at some point?  If so, when?

-- 
Chris Adams <cmadams@xxxxxxxxxx>
Systems and Network Administrator - HiWAAY Internet Services
I don't speak for anybody but myself - that's enough trouble.

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux