Re: buildsys Broken dependencies - libc

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 11/15/2009 09:37 PM, Arthur G wrote:
> Hi anyonewhocanhelp,
> 
> Just curious, is libc now an explicit dependency or should I buy a
sense of humour? 
> 
> broken dependencies in the development tree:
> On ppc:
>        xmlfy-1.5.0-1.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4)
>        xmlfy-1.5.0-1.fc12.ppc requires libc.so.6
> ....etc
> 
> Regs, Arthur.
> 

You are not alone, I receives the same broken dependencies for PPC and
PPC64. I wonder if migration for both architecture as "second class" has
occurred in a process.

- -- 
Luya Tshimbalanga
Graphic & Web Designer
E: luya@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
W: http://www.thefinalzone.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAksBDfwACgkQaS6HaNQHFTn31wCePwWtki4IJHQuv0vc2HfPe5nF
V9kAn1O+pGsbFb5w3QD4KawQwgBfHu0S
=Ojqa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux