On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 03:34:09PM +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 03:58:25PM +0200, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > On Sat, Nov 14, 2009 at 07:21:13PM +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > > On 11/14/2009 07:22 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote: > > > > On Mon, Nov 09, 2009 at 05:29:30PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: > > > >> We have just completed our Go / No Go meeting for Fedora 12 and have > > > >> reached the decision to Go. Fedora 12's package set is golden and we're > > > >> ready to stage things for shipping. Great work all around, I'm very > > > >> proud of this release. I'm sure there will be more back patting and > > > >> hand shaking to come, but Will Woods would like to remind everybody that > > > >> it's just 11 weeks until Fedora 13 Alpha freeze! > > > >> > > > > > > > > Hmm.. so I guess this means Fedora 12 will ship with 2.6.31.5 kernel? > > > > > > > > 2.6.31.6 would have had some important Xen PV guest bugfixes: > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=533730 > > > > > > I am sure, we will get kernel updates post-release due to security > > > reasons anyway. > > > > > > > Yeah.. that I'm aware of. It just means the GA kernel (and thus > > installer) won't boot on Intel Nehalem CPUs. > > Judging from the bug report, it will only fail to boot when used over Xen. > Which I believe represents small minority of Fedora users. > Yes, when used as Xen paravirtualized (PV) guest, on Intel Nehalem CPUs :) -- Pasi -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
