Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 11:09 +0100, Patrice Dumas a écrit : > On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 11:06:45AM +0100, Nicolas Mailhot wrote: > > Le vendredi 13 novembre 2009 à 10:55 +0100, Andreas Schwab a écrit : > > > Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot@xxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > You do it like everyone else. You pass the codepoints to fontconfig > > > > > > Emacs does that already AFAIK. > > > > Then it has no actual need to the fallback path. It's probably only > > there because emacs people were not 100% confident on the new fontconfig > > code they wrote. > > There is also a portability issue. Maybe emacs is also meant to work > on old unices that don't use fontconfig. Well in that case you do not include the code for old unices in the version built for modern unices such as Fedora -- Nicolas Mailhot
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Ceci est une partie de message =?ISO-8859-1?Q?num=E9riquement?= =?ISO-8859-1?Q?_sign=E9e?=
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
