On Wed, Nov 11, 2009 at 12:53:35PM +0000, Christopher Brown wrote: >Oops, too late! > >[chris@yoda ~]$ sudo yum update >Loaded plugins: presto, refresh-packagekit >Setting up Update Process >Resolving Dependencies >--> Running transaction check >---> Package dhclient.x86_64 12:4.1.0p1-4.fc11 set to be updated >---> Package f-spot.x86_64 0:0.6.1.3-1.fc11 set to be updated >---> Package f-spot-screensaver.x86_64 0:0.6.1.3-1.fc11 set to be updated >--> Processing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1()(64bit) for >package: iptstate-2.2.1-5.fc11.x86_64 >---> Package libnetfilter_conntrack.x86_64 0:0.0.100-1.fc11 set to be updated >---> Package libvorbis.x86_64 1:1.2.0-9.fc11 set to be updated >---> Package libvorbis-devel.x86_64 1:1.2.0-9.fc11 set to be updated >--> Finished Dependency Resolution >iptstate-2.2.1-5.fc11.x86_64 from installed has depsolving problems > --> Missing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1()(64bit) is >needed by package iptstate-2.2.1-5.fc11.x86_64 (installed) >Error: Missing Dependency: libnetfilter_conntrack.so.1()(64bit) is >needed by package iptstate-2.2.1-5.fc11.x86_64 (installed) > You could try using --skip-broken to work around the problem > You could try running: package-cleanup --problems > package-cleanup --dupes > rpm -Va --nofiles --nodigest > >Is there any way to sanity-check pushed updates for depsolving capabilities? There is, but it hasn't been implemented yet and it would add quite a bit of time to the updates compose process. I plan on working on it RSN. josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
