Re: A question about allow_unconfined_mmap_low in f11 amd selinux

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Daniel J Walsh <dwalsh <at> redhat.com> writes:

> > definitely still getting the error with any Wine application with
> > mmap_low_allowed set to 0.
> > 
> > selinux-policy-3.6.32-41.fc12.noarch
> > 
> The name has changed between RHEL5 - allow_unconfined_mmap_low 
> and F12 - mmap_low_allowed 
> 
> The meaning has also changed 
> 
> in RHEL5
> 
> unconfined domains are allowed to mmap_low if the boolean is set.  vbetool
> and wine are allowed whether or
> not the boolean is set.
> 
> In F12
> No domains are allowed to mmap_low unless the boolean is set.   If it is 
> set wine, vbetool and unconfined
> domains are allowed to mmap_zero.
> 
> One of you is running wine in RHEL5 which is allowed to mmap_zero without
> the boolean.  We changed this in F12
> so that wine will break without the boolean set.

Thank you for that clarification Dan.

By the way I entered a private ticket at the Crossover site (hence not 
publicly visible), and have been told that their devs are currently 
already looking at this issue to try to see if the problem can be 
worked around in a new version of Crossover, which will presumably
also be made available to newer versions of wine if a solution can be found.




-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux