On Sun, Nov 08, 2009 at 09:39:47PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote: >On Sat, Nov 07, 2009 at 03:28:35PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Sat, 2009-11-07 at 21:27 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> > https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-infrastructure/ticket/1800 >> >> We wanted to get some testing on the new updates repos before enabling >> them to the world, that's why they redirects haven't been updated. >> Hopefully we'll be good to go on those on Monday. > >If rel-eng wants to publish an 'empty' repo somewhere on the master >mirror, I could have MM redirect the 'updates' repos to that empty >repo until content is present for them. That would avoid having it >look like both updates and fedora repos both have identical content. We have actual F12 updates pushed already. Why does it need to be an 'empty' repo? josh -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
