On Sat, 7 Nov 2009 16:38:38 -0600 Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 11:06:14 -0700, > Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:57:42 -0600 > > Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 17:18:16 -0700, > > > Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. > > > > > > > > bruno:BADURL:glest_data_3.2.1.zip:glest-data > > > > > > I took over glest recently and hadn't had to worry about where the > > > sources had come from yet. The next time I make a change I'll be > > > sure to make sure that the source URLs are accurate. > > > > Excellent. Thanks. > > I tried grabbing http://dl.sf.net/glest/glest_data_3.2.1.zip and it > seemed to work. The actual URL in the spec file has the %version > macro. > > Is the macro or something with sourceforge the problem? It's sourceforge. I use 'spectool -g foo.spec', which expands all the macros... Here's what my script said for that spec: --2009-11-01 17:16:41-- http://dl.sf.net/glest/glest_data_3.2.1.zip Resolving dl.sf.net... 128.101.240.209, 150.65.7.130, 198.142.1.17, ... Connecting to dl.sf.net|128.101.240.209|:80... connected. HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 404 Not Found 2009-11-01 17:16:42 ERROR 404: Not Found. Sadly, I think sf is just unreliable. ;( kevin
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
