On 11/06/2009 03:58 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2009-11-06 at 14:45 -0500, Casey Dahlin wrote: >> >> Because we're acting as de facto upstream for what is effectively a >> piece of abandonware. Grub development is essentially dead. This isn't >> a nice place to be in as a downstream. >> > > And yet grub2 still doesn't have all the things we need it to have, that > is in our grub, and seem to still not want our stuff yet. Also not a > great place to be as a downstream. > > He asked why there was a need, not whether the alternative at hand /met/ that need. I've not heard glowing recommendations of Grub 2 from people that follow it, but saying there's no reason to /want/ to be rid of Grub is silly. --CJD -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
