2009/11/5 Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx>: > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:57:42 -0600 > Bruno Wolff III <bruno@xxxxxxxx> wrote: > >> On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 17:18:16 -0700, >> Kevin Fenzi <kevin@xxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> > Here's attached another run of my sources/patches url checker. >> > >> > bruno:BADURL:glest_data_3.2.1.zip:glest-data >> >> I took over glest recently and hadn't had to worry about where the >> sources had come from yet. The next time I make a change I'll be sure >> to make sure that the source URLs are accurate. > > Excellent. Thanks. > >> P.S. >> If the audiance for this report is developers, I think it would make >> more sense to sort on the FAS name and then on package name. > > ok. I think I did do that in the past, but failed this time. ;( > > kevin > Don't worry, my mail reader has a magical search function I can use to look for my FAS name. ;-) The packages of mine in that list I will look at this weekend. -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
