Re: Current libgdl induced mess

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Bill Nottingham (notting@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> Debarshi Ray (debarshi.ray@xxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > Actually I had requested a freeze override for Anjuta and libgdl [1]
> > causing the mess. Actually the changes between 2.27.92 to 2.28.0
> > included the addition of an extra enum value to GdlSwitcherStyle and I
> > did not expect this to cause a bump in the soname. But it was bumped
> > and I failed to notice it. My mistake.
> > 
> > This new enum value is not being used as far as I know, so how do you
> > propose we clean this? Untag the new libgdl or rebuild the other
> > packages?
> 
> How many 'other packages' are we referring to here?

Never mind, I see 4 packages.

So:
- I'd rather ship a released version of libgdl
- None of these are critical path

How quickly can you build?

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux