2009/11/5 Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@xxxxxxxxx>: > Hello. > > I have got few bugs [1] about conflicts between qstat (package) and > torque-client where qstat is a POSIX registered name for some special > service. > Upstream as far as I know is like dead than alive. Thus, better > solution to rename binary is not so simple. > Nowadays the Conflicts: field is filled in the qstat.spec but > torque-client doesn't have such field (and I understand the point). > > So, my idea is to ask upstream to change binary name and > simultaneously raise discussion at distributions-list@fdo to do the > same if upstream doesn't appear. > > Any comments, suggestions? > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=472750 > > -- > With Best Regards, > Andy Shevchenko > > -- > fedora-devel-list mailing list > fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx > https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list > There have been various comments in a former thread raised about the conflict a few days ago. Basically everyone involved into the discussion agreed that changing the binary name of qstat is the way to go. I guess the only program that has to be patched is xqf. kind regards, Rudolf Kastl -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
