Re: conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

To: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client
From: Bill Nottingham <notting@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 4 Nov 2009 13:38:36 -0500
In-reply-to: <4AF19437.9020702@xxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: Development discussions related to Fedora <fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-08-17)

> Because seedit getting installed causes selinux-policy-targeted and friends to get screwed up.

That sounds like a reason to not ship seedit. Am I missing something?

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Follow-Ups:
- Re: conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client
  - From: Daniel J Walsh
- Re: conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client
  - From: Rudolf Kastl

References:
- conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client
  - From: Rudolf Kastl
- Re: conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client
  - From: Daniel J Walsh

Prev by Date: Re: Kernel using LZMA compression
Next by Date: Re: Ubuntu shows updates / security updates on shell logins
Previous by thread: Re: conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client
Next by thread: Re: conflict between seedit <-> selinux-policy and qstat <-> torque-client
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Kernel] [Fedora Testing] [Fedora Formulas] [Fedora PHP Devel] [Kernel Development] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Maintainers] [Fedora Desktop] [PAM] [Red Hat Development] [Gimp] [Yosemite News]