2009/11/4 Steve Traylen <steve.traylen@xxxxxxx>: > On Wed, Nov 4, 2009 at 5:04 PM, Andrew Overholt <overholt@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >> * Orion Poplawski <orion@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [2009-11-04 10:58]: >>> On 11/04/2009 07:47 AM, Rawhide Report wrote: >>> >Compose started at Wed Nov 4 08:15:08 UTC 2009 >>> > >>> >Broken deps for ppc64 >>> >---------------------------------------------------------- >>> > eclipse-photran-5.0.0-0.3.200910081739.fc12.noarch requires eclipse-cdt>= 1:6.0 >>> > >>> >>> Is there any way to exclude a noarch package from certain arches? >> >> ExcludeArch >> > Maybe I am missing something here but if the architecture matters it's not a > a noarch package by definition. > It's a Java package, so it *is* effectively noarch, but it depends on an archful package that excludes ppc64. -- Mat Booth A: Because it destroys the order of the conversation. Q: Why shouldn't you do it? A: Posting your reply above the original message. Q: What is top-posting? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
