Adam Williamson wrote: > On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 14:00 +0100, Roberto Ragusa wrote: >> Adam Williamson wrote: >> >>> And why the hell are you still using Luxi Mono, anyway? that thing went >>> out with the ark... >> I'm not the person you are posing your question to, but I use Luxi Mono >> and can give you an answer: >> "Because it is a wonderful serif mono font. Can you suggest me an >> alternative? It looks like mono => sans nowadays." > > I'm a big member of the 'fonts are subjective' bandwagon, but I'm > _really_ surprised that anyone would consider the Luxi fonts to look > better than the DejaVu ones. DejaVu is just a far more polished font > set, which is why it was chosen by all major distros to replace Luxi > years ago. You're literally the first person I've come across who seems > to prefer the appearance of Luxi. Nothing wrong with that, I suppose, > I'm just surprised =) I've never said that Luxi fonts are better than DejaVu fonts. What I've said is that there is no alternative to Luxi Mono if one wants a serif monospaced font. I like to have a serif font in my shell; I find it more readable, even at small size. -- Roberto Ragusa mail at robertoragusa.it -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
