On Mon, 2009-11-02 at 08:49 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Mon, Nov 02, 2009 at 09:43:30 -0500, Adam Jackson <ajax@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > > Strictly, this is not true. Newer binutils has a feature called > > "indirect functions" that lets you do (logically, this is not what the > > syntax actually looks like): > > Can you point us to some documentation on this? > > Is this something that is encouraged for use in Fedora? Well, the best documentation I can find is the thread discussing the implementation: http://www.x86-64.org/pipermail/discuss/2009-June/010546.html and the testcase in binutils: http://github.com/jiez/binutils/blob/master/ld/testsuite/ld-ifunc/lib.c glibc seems to be using it in a few places in F12, so I can't imagine it's too broken. That said, I don't think it's the _recommended_ solution for Fedora yet. - ajax
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
