Le Jeu 29 octobre 2009 17:21, Christoph Frieben a écrit : > The empirical result remains, however, and it is consistent with that > of any other font that I have looked at. It is consistent for you. You'd need a massive test campaign to prove this is not subjective, not limited to a specific set of fonts, a particular hardware/screen resolution/dpi, etc. The internet is littered with opinions on font rendering that all disagree with each other. >> Luxi Mono is not the Red Hat/Fedora monospaced font and is not even in the >> distribution. > > It was the default monospaced font for RHL 8/9, Fedora Core 1/2/3/4/5/6, > RHEL 3/4/5 and still **is** for current RHEL 5.4. I thus consider legitimate > to > comment on it, too, as I expect to be not the only person being attached > to using it .. You may comment on it, but do not expect Fedora to care over-much about a component that was removed in Fedora 9 (4 release cycles ago, for legal reasons so it has 0 chance to get back in). For RHEL please go through RHEL channels. -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
