On Tuesday 27 October 2009 03:17:15 pm Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-10-27 at 12:40 -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > Id like to get some feedback on the patches that i'm proposing for F-13. > > quite a few packages that need to deal with differences between > > 32bit/64bit or multilib arches have defines for the appropriate arches. > > sometimes incomplete since they don't include secondary arches. > > I'm not really a fan of growing more macro goo, particularly if it's > Fedora specific macro goo :/ > the multilib ones were the only ones i intended to put in redhat-rpm-config though im just as happy to try and get it into rpm. the rest i had intended to get into rpm. Dennis
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
