Re: RFC: proposed macro deffinitions for F-13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi All,
> 
> Id like to get some feedback on the patches that i'm proposing for F-13.  
> quite a few packages that need to deal with differences between 32bit/64bit  or 
> multilib arches have defines for the appropriate arches.  sometimes incomplete 
> since they don't include secondary arches.
> 
> I wanted to get some feedback. and see if there are other cases we should add.
> 
> Dennis
> 

I have hacks like this in e2fsprogs.spec for example:


%ifarch %{multilib_arches}
mv -f %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/ext2fs/ext2_types.h \
      %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/ext2fs/ext2_types-%{_arch}.h
install -p -m 644 %{SOURCE1} %{buildroot}%{_includedir}/ext2fs/ext2_types.h
%endif

Unless I'm doing a Bad Thing here, maybe some macros to facilitate this
type of header mangling for multiarch?

-Eric

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux