Michael Schwendt wrote: > On Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:37:28 +0100, Fabio wrote: > >>>> I also considered a specific file Requires: /usr/bin/virsh, but policy >>>> suggests to avoid that for different reasons. >>> Really? What policy is that? Programs in bin paths are covered by the >>> primary metadata. Such a dependency would be more accurate. >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#File_Dependencies >> >> I understand that files in bin paths are already covered by primary >> data, but the way it is formulated there, it sounds (to me) that there >> is still extra processing involved from the different depsolver. > > You've misread that section. Most of it comments on file dependencies > _outside_ (!) /etc and bin paths. Those are the ones you ought to avoid, > as the depsolvers would need to download and parse additional metadata > archives. Ok, thanks for the clarification. Update spec files are on the way. Fabio -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
