Re: ld ignoring parts of LD_LIBRARY_PATH?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Am Dienstag, den 27.10.2009, 10:30 +0100 schrieb Christoph Höger:
> Hi,
> 
> this is slightly off topic, but may be relevant for fedora developing,
> too:
> 
> I have set up a small test bed for an application I am converting to a
> autotools build system. In this testbed I have:
> 
> ./lib/libfoo.so
> ./lib/bar/libbar.so
> 
> When I add the lib/ entry to LD_LIBRARY_PATH it is recognized and
> scanned for libraries. The same for the lib/bar entry. But when I add
> both, the lib/ entry is ignored completely. Is this normal?
> 
> regards

Please forget this crap - I was confused by my headache this morning and
did not see that the error occured during _compile time_

sry

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: Dies ist ein digital signierter Nachrichtenteil

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux