On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 12:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > AFAICT, the native LLVM backends don't have that problem. The real problem > with C++ is that Clang's C++ support is experimental and incomplete, so > you're stuck with llvm-g++. > >> I thought that C doesn't have any crazy name or symbol or virtual >> table mangling. The stuff should just work, right? > > But this is about C++. I don't mean to misunderstand, but if I recall from your very first post in this thread... > Actually, the ABI issue is only if you use the C code generator, not the > native ones. Hence I thought you were talking about ABI issues with C. I'm not up on how LLVM frontend integration works, so I actually don't understand the distinction between "the LLVM C Backend" and "the native LLVM backends". Simply, can I write and compile a GTK program with LLVM? I'd love to use it for the intuitive error reporting, honestly. -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
