Re: Looking into LLVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 21:05 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:

> LLVM 2.6 has been announced with Clang declared as production quality in
> this release
> 
> http://lists.cs.uiuc.edu/pipermail/llvm-announce/2009-October/000033.html
> 
> Has anyone been looking into building Fedora with it to see how the
> performance impact is?

I'm going to go out on a limb here and say that the dominating factor in
our performance is the code itself.

Also, last time I checked, llvm's dwarf support was even worse than
gcc's.  No thanks.

- ajax

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux