On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 22:28 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote: > On Sun, 2009-10-25 at 22:20 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 25.10.2009, 20:56 +0100 schrieb Haïkel Guémar: > > > > > This is personal policy to always push latest stable unless it's broken, > > > since it wasn't critical, i had always delayed it. > > > Why i pushed the update on older branches ? Maintainers are asked to > > > support branches until EOL and it worked on my test VM. > > > Maybe, i'm just a bit maniacal. ;) > > > > Definitely. ;) To "support" does not mean to drown users in useless > > updates. We had this discussions over and over again, please look for > > the thread called "The updates firehose" back in June 2007. > > > > > Did it break anything ? For the moment, updates are staging in testing, > > > i can unpush them if you think it's more appropriate. :) > > > > In this case I think you really should unpush it. Not only for F-11 but > > for F-11 as well, possibly F12 to. If this update doesn't fix anything > > on Linux, then don't push it. > > Then you get bug from people expecting the latest version because you're > not up to date... > > Come-on this is maintainer decision and as long as it doesn't break > anyone, leave it that way. err s/anyone/anything/, sorry Pierre -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
