Re: rpms/libXres/devel .cvsignore, 1.9, 1.10 libXres.spec, 1.26, 1.27 sources, 1.10, 1.11

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Adam Jackson wrote, at 10/14/2009 03:20 AM +9:00:
On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 10:32 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
If all Fedora releases have the autoprovides but EL-5 is still
affected, the
draft can be as simple as: rpm detects pkgconfig dependencies in all
Fedora
releases, please move the pkgconfig requires from [LINK] to the EPEL
specific guidelines.

Done:

https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/PkgconfigAutoRequires

AFAICT this became automagic in F-10, but I can't find any overt history
of that in redhat-rpm-macros.

- ajax

Actually in the change of rpm (not redhat-rpm-config) and from F-11.
Note that F-10 rpm also generated pkgconfig related "Provides" lists,
but not "Requires" list (i.e. adding "Requires: pkgconfig" and some
pkgconfig related Requires list is still needed for F-10 packages, although
F-10 is going to be EOL).
The example is the following packages.

F-11: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1592955
F-10: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/rpminfo?rpmID=1592985

The explanation is:
https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-devel-list/2008-November/msg02173.html

Regards,
Mamoru

--
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux