Re: rpms/libXt/devel .cvsignore, 1.11, 1.12 libXt.spec, 1.33, 1.34 sources, 1.12, 1.13

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 





On Tue, 13 Oct 2009, Jesse Keating wrote:

On Tue, 2009-10-13 at 22:18 +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote:
  I am confused here. Why this is removed? I still see xt.pc needs
those "Requires".

rpm now autogenerates the pkgconfig requirements,
both /usr/bin/pkg-config and also the pkgconfig(foo) level requirements.
Maybe the guidelines haven't caught up to this yet?

Probably true.


I'd just like to add a note to Parag: Thanks for reading the package commits. It pleases me that people are checking up on various commits that go in.

This change in particular seems harmless but it's nice to know there are people looking at any commits of any packages.

-sv


-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux