I've been a comaintainer of the python-setuptools package for a long time and recently became the owner when icon relinquished it. It is currently a tumultuous time for distributing python modules with a new and active maintainer for distutils inside of the python stdlib and a fork of setuptools being worked on. That fork is named distribute and there are two branches of development on it. The 0.7 branch aims to implement API, metadata, and other features that will make packaging python modules for upstream building and distribution easier while being more concerned with the effects this has on Linux packagers. The 0.6 branch intends to be compatible with the current seutptools package but to fix bugs and introduce features that are backwards compatible and oft requested. This branch is being actively maintained by a core group of five committers including the new distutils maintainer. By contrast, setuptools is maintained by a single maintainer who often has little time to work on it. When installed, the 0.6 branch takes over the setuptools and pkg_resources python modules. The reasoning is that distribute-0.6 provides the same API as setuptools and is meant to replace it. If the module was installed differently, consuming code (all the setup.py modules in any setuptools using package as well as code that relies on setuptools features at runtime) would all need to change their import statements to use the new names explicitly. This choice is being made upstream by the distribute project. Upstream, the python community has viewed the fork favorably but since it's not part of python proper, the only one with say in the matter is the setuptools author. He has not been willing to abandon the setuptools module but at the same time hasn't gained any more free time to work on setuptools. Several other Linux distributions (gentoo and arch) have started shipping distribute-0.6 as the source of their setuptools package. I am thinking of doing the same for rawhide and pushing the change to older Fedora releases if bugs are reported that are fixed in distribute but not in seutptools as having a responsive upstream that cares about distribution packaging issues is a great plus for us. I raised this plan on fedora-python-devel and received one positive comment and no negative feedback so I'm just mentioning it here so a broader audience can ask any questions or raise any issues before putting this into effect. -Toshio
Attachment:
pgpLi0dQECUo6.pgp
Description: PGP signature
-- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
