Jesse Keating wrote: > On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 16:13 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Fri, 2009-10-09 at 18:56 -0400, Neal Becker wrote: >> > Just received: >> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=528237 >> > >> > yum install libotf-devel.i586 libotf-devel.x86_64 >> > >> > yields: >> > >> > Transaction Check Error: >> > file /usr/bin/libotf-config from install of >> > libotf-devel-0.9.8-2.fc11.i586 >> > conflicts with file from package libotf-devel-0.9.8-2.fc11.x86_64 >> > file /usr/share/doc/libotf-devel-0.9.8/example/Makefile from install >> > of >> > libotf-devel-0.9.8-2.fc11.i586 conflicts with file from package >> > libotf-devel-0.9.8-2.fc11.x86_64 >> > >> > What is the recommended way to resolve this? >> >> It's not to be considered a bug, AFAIK. We don't stipulate that >> development packages be installable side-by-side in this way, we only >> stipulate that for library packages where there's a need for it. There's >> no particular use case where you absolutely need both -devel packages >> installed at once. >> >> -- >> Adam Williamson >> Fedora QA Community Monkey >> IRC: adamw | Fedora Talk: adamwill AT fedoraproject DOT org >> http://www.happyassassin.net >> > > Actually this is a bug. If the packages are offered in the same repo, > they should install together (barring explicit conflicts listed in the > spec file). Looks like the example makefile may be generated at build > time, or touched in someway so that it is different when on i686 and > x86_64. That should not happen, they should be the same. > Both /usr/bin/libotf-config and example/Makefile are autoconf-generated. Suggestions? -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
