On Wed, 7 Oct 2009 13:04:35 -0700, Conrad wrote: > On Wednesday 07 October 2009 12:55:10 pm Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote: > > On 10/07/2009 03:19 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > > > Lyos Gemini Norezel wrote: > > >> Is there valid, logical, reasoning to continue to support such old code? > > > > > > Are there any bugs that are so severe that we can't continue using the > > > software? > > > > No, actually. > > > > Surprisingly enough... there are no current bugs open against id3lib. > > > > > If not: Why throw out working software just because it's old? > > > > Don't security risks grow exponentially as software 'bit rots'? > > Is it possible that id3lib is 'complete'? Would be unusual, considering how complex the later ID3v2 specs are. > The id3 format isn't extremely complicated, Define "extremely complicated". http://www.id3.org/Compliance_Issues -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
