Re: Opinions on packaging ATLAS (for the x86 architecture)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Richard W.M. Jones (rjones@xxxxxxxxxx) said: 
> > This is going to be pretty important for scientific workloads where
> > atlas is going to be used. I've eavesdropped on several conversations
> > where people were talking about being able to run off-the-shelf
> > science code virtual appliance in order to reduce the environment
> > configuration workload for an individual researcher.
> 
> Yup.  The really fun starts when you do live migration.  The processor
> literally changes underneath the running programs.  If you thought you
> had SSE3 one minute, then the next you don't, or vice versa.
> 
> No one has to my knowledge come up with a good way to deal with this.
> But it probably involves signalling the kernel and processes so that
> they can redo processor detection.  You can see why that is not going
> to be pleasant.

Surely the way to do this is to know what your workload is doing,
and not do live migration to random hardware? 

Bill

-- 
fedora-devel-list mailing list
fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Announce]     [Fedora Kernel]     [Fedora Testing]     [Fedora Formulas]     [Fedora PHP Devel]     [Kernel Development]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Maintainers]     [Fedora Desktop]     [PAM]     [Red Hat Development]     [Gimp]     [Yosemite News]
  Powered by Linux