Le Mar 6 octobre 2009 17:03, Tom \"spot\" Callaway a écrit : > > On 10/06/2009 10:37 AM, Panu Matilainen wrote: >> It is out of scope for this discussion though, the question here is >> about the default value Fedora packages should have. The BUGURL tag >> contents is just a plain old string which is expanded from %bugurl macro >> at build time and currently no further processing is done on it. > > http://bugz.fedoraproject.org/%{name} would be ideal here, but we would > need for %{name} to evaluate to the SRPM name, not the subpackage name. BTW, this is a more general problem: currently rpm metadata does not reference the %{name} of the srpm, but its filename, which is a PITA, since srpm filename is not really useful nowadays (also IIRC you can rename a srpm to anything.src.rpm and the result will build and reference anything.src.rpm as srpm info) -- Nicolas Mailhot -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
