On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 10:43 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote: > On Tue, 2009-10-06 at 19:59 +0300, Panu Matilainen wrote: > > Well in that case rpm is the wrong place entirely, and ditto for respins > > controlling their own bug report URLs. For these you'd want the bug > > reporting URL in repodata instead: spins are creating their own > > repositories so they can set it there, and regenerating the repodata to > > include a new url is cheaper than rebuilding all the packages. > > Yeah, if you always keep track of which packages you installed from > which repos and thus which bug system that particular package you > installed goes to. (think of famous 3rd party repos that replace > packages from us) Yum already keeps track of that: # yum list installed yum\* Installed Packages yum.noarch 3.2.24-9.fc12 @rawhide yum-metadata-parser.x86_64 1.1.2-12.fc11 @fedora yum-plugin-aliases.noarch 1.1.22-1.fc11 @updates yum-plugin-security.noarch 1.1.22-1.fc11 @updates yum-presto.noarch 0.5.0-1.fc11 @updates yum-utils.noarch 1.1.22-1.fc11 @updates yumex.noarch 2.0.5-6.fc11 @fedora -- James Antill - james@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx "I'd just like to see a realistic approach to updates via packages." -- Les Mikesell -- fedora-devel-list mailing list fedora-devel-list@xxxxxxxxxx https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-devel-list
